Isabel B

March 15, 2010

Xiu Xiu: The Sent Down Girl review

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 4:33 am

WILD APPLAUSE
XIU XIU: THE SENT DOWN GIRL: Drama. Starring Lu Lu. Directed
by Joan Chen. Written by Yan Geling and Joan Chen. (Rated R. 99
minutes. In Mandarin with English subtitles. Opens today today at the
Embarcadero Center Cinema, Act One/Act Two in Berkeley, Rafael Film
Center in San Rafael and Camera 3 in San Jose.)



“Xiu Xiu: The Sent-Down Girl” marks a stunning directing debut for
Joan Chen, the Chinese-born actress who appeared in “The Last
Emperor” and “Twin Peaks” and has lived for several years in San
Francisco.

Poetic in its images, devastating in its emotional impact,
“Xiu Xiu” (pronounced show-show) hardly seems the product of an
actress’ first stab at directing — but rather like the measured,
mature expression of a film master. The film, which opens today at
the Embarcadero, is that good: a tragic,
hauntingly beautiful tale of innocence lost that holds its own
against the best works of contemporary Asian directors Zhang Yimou
and Chen Kaige.

Some non-paid streaming video movie sites warn that cost-free streaming video services can only offer you bad quality movies with annoying resolutions that destroy your online movie watching experience, it is almost often host, i.e. does the site have alot of bandwidth for uninterrupted viewing, or working links to the streaming movies you want to watch? These very important considerations that will have the greatest influence on the quality of your relaxation is what you will choose: download movie sites or watching site. Download movie sites give a great quality , so you can enjoy your favorite films in hd quality anytime. Download 12 Men of Christmas full length excellent quality movie hd

Based on a novella by Yan Geling, another San Francisco
resident who co-wrote the script with Chen, “Xiu Xiu” opens in 1975
in the city of Chengdu, during the last years of the Chinese Cultural
Youth Revolution. There, a spirited 15-year-old girl prepares to join
the millions of youths who were “sent down” to remote provinces for
government training.

Played by Lu Lu, a young actress whom Chen discovered in San
Francisco, Xiu Xiu is spirited, outspoken and devoted to her tailor
father and attentive mother. The prospect of a year’s isolation is
daunting: Xiu Xiu knows it’s going to be hard, but she has no way to
anticipate how demeaning it will prove.

After a year in a military camp where the only diversions
are outdoor screenings of propaganda films, Xiu Xiu is sent to the
Tibetan plains to learn horse-herding from Lao Jin (Lopsang), a
solitary herdsman who
shares his falling-apart army tent with the modest Xiu Xiu.
Initially, the simple Lao Jin sees Xiu Xiu as silly and spoiled;
gradually, she becomes a receptacle for a love he didn’t know he had.

Before long, Lao Jin is digging a large hole, hauling rocks
and a large tarpaulin to build a private bath for Xiu Xiu. She begins
to relax with him, teases and opens up, but is so intent on returning
to the city that she never notices the depth of his feeling.

Chen, who made her film under difficult physical conditions
and without Chinese government permits, does something amazing here.
She uses her brilliant visual sense not only to capture the
enchantment and mystery of the Tibetan landscape, with its wide
vistas and rolling hills, but also to tell a story that feels nearly
mythic in its themes of betrayal, devotion and power.

Xiu Xiu’s wish for home is so strong that when a handsome
peddler appears one day and claims he has the influence to secure her
identification papers and travel permits, she gives herself to him. A
number of visitors follow, each promising the same thing.

“Xiu Xiu” is exquisitely heartbreaking, and surprising in
the way it takes its young heroine down a grim path, rather than
granting her the cliched redemption and release of a Hollywood drama.
By avoiding the latter, Chen gives her film the integrity and power
of classic fables.

If there’s a single false step in “Xiu Xiu,” I didn’t
notice it. The actors are marvelous, the photography by Lu Yue
(“Shanghai Triad”) is breathtaking, and Chen’s grasp of pacing,
composition and storytelling is superb.

Chen may be a fine actress, but she’s an inspired filmmaker.

March 13, 2010

War Hunt review

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 8:53 pm
“It had the
same gritty feel to it as Sam Fuller’s The Steel Helmet.”

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

A crisp telling of the last days of the Korean conflict during 1953,
as a company of infantrymen engage the enemy. It marks the debut for Robert
Redford who plays the do-gooder Private Loomis, a new replacement in a
company of war-weary veterans. The film was shot in 15 days on a budget
of $250,000. It featured a young cast, hungry to make its mark. Not listed
in the credits is a very young Francis Ford Coppola, who plays an ambulance
driver. This surprisingly realistic war drama caught a dark side to the
war in a very personal way that very few war films have captured. It had
the same gritty feel to it as Sam Fuller’s “The Steel Helmet”, but the
emphasis here is more on a psychological nature than Fuller’s cultural.

Pvt. Raymond Endore (John Saxon) is the psychotic protagonist, who
voluntarily goes out at night on solitary patrols behind the enemy lines.
It is never explained why he’s willing to do this, as we just see him act
with a thirst for blood. Endore stays out all night never participating
with the other men in the regular patrols. He’s allowed to work on his
own because he brings back valuable information, which he dutifully reports
to Captain Pratt (Aidman). But Endore never talks about the soldiers he
slays. We see him sneak up on an enemy soldier as if he were invisible
and knifes the soldier in a ritualistic manner while standing over his
body, as if he were presenting the body to the gods.

Endore is a loner; the other men are wary of him even though they
consider him to be valuable to the company. The young Korean orphan, Charlie,
is the company mascot. He has a special relationship with Endore, who promises
to take him along one day when he goes behind the enemy lines. Endore also
promises to stay with him in Korea when the war is over, vowing to never
let him go back to the orphanage where they have ridiculous rules for everything.
Endore is one of those people who can’t live by the rules, considering
them to be mostly unnecessary.

The much older captain has a paternalistic relationship with his
prodigy who went on his own behind the lines, bringing back so much valuable
information to help the war effort that the captain lets this unusual practice
go on without official approval. Though, he put in a recommendation for
Endore to receive a medal for valor. But Endore was in it for the kill
only, his mind was past the reasonable stage of a soldier doing his duty
or in acting out of patriotism or for personal glory.

The battlefield conflict is shown in one devastating battle; there
are enough casualities to realize that this unexplainable U.N. action has
exacted
a large toll. This film is mostly concerned about those caught
in the middle ground between the idealistic Loomis and the psychopathic
Endore; those who cheer when a cease-fire is declared not caring who won,
and would have welcomed a diplomatic solution.

On a personal level, the psychological affects of the war are seen
through the conflict between Loomis and Endore. The prize is the Korean
orphan, whom Endore befriends and expects to be attached only to him. Loomis
expresses friendship to the kid and concern that the child should be back
in the orphanage, going to school and being with friends his own age. Endore
tells him to mind his own business, threatening him with a knife to his
throat.

The sheer black-and-white photography caught the expansive mood of
the troops in the battlefield and its grainy quality helped the viewer
see the war in a personalized way, as in the scene where the idealistic
Loomis is fighting for his survival in a hand-to-hand fight with a Chinese
soldier. The difference between him and Endore is that the later had to
kill, while Loomis kills when he doesn’t have to.

Warning: spoiler in the next paragraph.

The film concludes as a sniper kills Private Fresno just when the
cease-fire is announced and the soldiers react by firing back, until the
captain tells them let’s not do anything to prevent the war from ending
and from us going back home. But for Endore his mind is set for a permanent
war, and he disobeys orders and goes out on a night patrol after the cease-fire
was declared; but, this time taking Charlie with him, preparing to never
come back.

This is a wonderfully maddening film. John Saxon turns in a brilliant
performance as the killer who is valuable only during wartime, but loses
his value when the war is over; while Robert Redford was marvelous as the
rational one, who is prepared to live in peace once the war is over.

March 11, 2010

The Longest Yard review

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 8:43 pm


There is, wholly, something irrepressibly charming about Burt Reynolds. The valet who exudes, and for a production personifies, sex has a subtle, wild charm that enraptures the spirit of women and the envy of men with an oft-stamp glance. Even when he´s a rascally, irredeemable, drunken scamp like his character in "The Longest Yard" he is adept to sway the audience to discover in regard to him. Of course it helps that his antagonists suffer with even less social value than he does. And that, ultimately, is the point of the entire movie.

Burt Reynolds plays Paul Crewe, a washed-up quarterback who spends his days boozing and watching tube with his mistress. He´s irresolute and fierce, having nothing in life to elude. He destroyed the whole shooting match in a points-shaving disgrace while playing professional football and did it without bad conscience. After beating his girlfriend, Crewe goes on a wild chase with police, culminating with a barroom brawl with the authorities.

Sentenced to a Florida prison, Crewe is delineated an offer to help train the jail semi-pro football team in quid pro quo towards favors from the warden and the guards. Being a nihilist, Crewe turns them down. He´s abused by the guards, ostracized by his lover prisoners, and generally treated with no respect. But Crewe comes to an grasp of his situation and takes the hazard to form a football tandem join up of prisoners to oblige as a tune-up for the body of guards and, secretly, a one-and-only unintentional for the inmates to hit a guard without repercussion.

"The Longest Yard" is an interesting beast because, by and large, it suffers no "opportune guys." While Reynold´s Crewe is charming, if not affable, but the truth remains that he is an deprecatory nihilist. As much as I want to like Jim Hampton´s Caretaker, I know that he´s been imprisoned for a on account of. The guards, supposed to fill the bill as a bastion of order, perpetrate acts under the guise of their deference that are as execrable as anything done by the prisoners in the loyal world. We end up rooting for the team of prisoners starkly because they adhere to a code of ethics. The dynamic is rather akin to that of Red and Andy to Captain Hadly and Warden Norton in "The Shawshank Redemption."

Themes and characters aside, is "The Longest Yard" any good? Yes… with a caveat. The film is steeped in 70s style and it takes its time to set up the chronicle. My days has befit accustom to comedy being a string of united-liners with a loosely coherent plot to hang its hat on. That, or a sickly-sweet passionate comedy that tries, but rarely succeeds, to be funny. It almost seems like "The Longest Yard" was a story before it was a comedy. The geste is law-abiding and the major players are expressively defined.

The stew comes from a myriad of the minor characters. The rest of the team is a loosely defined mob who serves as setup benefit of a distinguish anecdote and then forgotten. The film plays up monsters like Richard Kiel, Jaws of James Bond fame, but only uses them to go to a quick, almost throwaway witticism. There´s a karate trained on the field who is supposed to be the most fatal cover shackles alive… yet we on no account alight the chance to detect him do his qualities. Fortunately the anchors of the team of guards are obstinate, villainous characters including one of the meanest men to ever challenge football, Ray Nitschke. As a long-without delay Packer zealot I´ve got a special appointment in my heart owing Nitschke, and he does an absolutely incredible berth playing a stained football instrumentalist in this film. Additionally Ed Lauter´s Captain Knauer is sadistically, deviously delicious.

Albeit the comedy is good, this is after all is said a motion picture about football and it discretion live or die by those merits. Fortunately the action on the field at the end of the day does look like semi-pro football from the 70s. It´s a little gushing but the play looks convincing. The delinquent with it lies in the fact that they don´t tell the story of the game, slightly they tell snippets of the story, and as a herself who finds the ebbs and flows of the game important, it´s maddening. You are forced, as a viewer, to bloat in the time gaps with your ingenuity and while most people won´t have on the agenda c trick any problem doing that, it did confuse me.

Overall I found "The Longest Yard" an enjoyable movie. It´s got some very different characters and elicits a true sense of pathos when they are hurt on the field of play or when a player loses his life. Several scenes had me on the edge of my behind hoping what I was with a bun in the oven, wouldn´t because I had developed feelings in the service of Paul, Caretaker, and the lot. That´s the highest praise anyone can give a movie that´s, "just a comedy." The forthcoming remake want all things considered nab the humor of the original, but to in all honesty take the place of it needs to find the original´s heart.


March 9, 2010

Seven (1995)

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 3:18 am
“It is one of the best and most
intelligent serial killer films ever made.”

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

Director David Fincher’s stylish psychological thriller is set in
the bowels of NYC and is about mismatched homicide detectives tracking
down a biblically inspired elusive serial killer. It is one of the best
and most intelligent serial killer films ever made. Detective David Mills
(Brad Pitts) is a young, cocky, fiery man, who requested he be transferred
to the inner city. His attractive wife (Gwyneth Paltrow) hates the city
and reluctantly let her macho hubby talk her into moving here from their
more serene upstate residence. The lowbrow David is assigned to work with
the testy, highly educated, world-weary and enigmatic 34-year veteran bachelor,
Lt. Detective William Somerset (Morgan Freeman). He is retiring in one
week because he is tired of dealing with so much crime and of the public’s
apathy, and is not receptive to his new partner and his cowboy attitude.
Somerset has no interest in breaking him in.

Their first assignment is the gruesome death of a homebound man who
is so fat he can’t fit through the door of his shabby apartment. The man
died while forced to eat for days and is found with his head buried in
a dish of pasta sauce, and on the wall behind the refrigerator is scribbled
in blood the word — Gluttony. There’s also a pound of flesh cut off from
his body. Somerset wants off this case, since he realizes this is going
to be a long and complex one and he hates to retire without solving it.

Somerset suspects he’s dealing with a serial killer, and soon he’s
proven right as a second gruesome murder is discovered. A wealthy, high-profile
criminal lawyer, Eli Gould, is bled to death and with his blood the word
Greed is written on the floor. Somerset makes the biblical connection to
the Seven Deadly Sins–1) Gluttony. 2) Greed. 


3) Sloth. 4) Wrath. 5) Pride. 6) Lust. 7) Envy. He thereby goes
to the library to research authors who have written about these sins, and
gives his partner a reading list that includes Dante, Thomas Aquinas, Chaucer,
and Milton.

There are five more murders on the way in this dark, moody thriller.
The detectives are brought together by David’s wife Tracy (Gwyneth Paltrow).
She invites Somerset to dinner in the couple’s apartment and that act allows
the men to get to know each other better and to gradually bond despite
their differences.

The serial killer is known as John Doe. And as diabolical as his
crimes are, he is nevertheless brilliant in his execution of them. In all
the crime scenes, he leaves no prints. Victim number three is tied to the
sin of sloth. He was a drug dealer and had been strapped to his bed for
a year and had been tortured all that time. His semi-dark apartment is
made more eerie by dozens of Christmas tree air-fresheners hanging from
the ceiling. When the police find him he is barely alive with his brain
crushed and his tongue missing. Somerset realizes that he can’t get off
the case because he now feels compelled to catch the serial killer, and
that Mills doesn’t have the experience or the temperament to get this type
of killer without his expertise.

Somerset by using his uncanny skills hits a lucky break by tracing
the killer’s address to a library card. But when they show up at John Doe’s
apartment, he spots them first and flees across rooftops and alleys. John
Doe even had a chance to kill Mills, but chooses not to.

The serial killer mocks the detectives by leaving clues to his next
crimes. But they are just not able to get there in time to save the next
victims: one is a prostitute who is sexually tortured to death and the
other a pretty woman whose face is disfigured, who die for ‘lust’ and ‘pride.’

The detectives are surprised when the killer walks into their police-station
to surrender, with blood dripping from his fingers. He refuses to give
his real name and no info on him could be found. He also says there are
two other bodies and he will only go with Somerset and Mills to where they
can be found.

This leads to the astonishing finale, as the serial killer pulls
off his psychotic mastermind plan. It is gross, shocking, volatile, and
extremely insane. The outstanding script by screenwriter Andrew Kevin Walker
is skillfully conceived, makeup artist Rob Bottin’ special effects are
effectively scary, Fincher’s direction is maddeningly tense and taut, and
the noirish and darkly graphic cinematography by Darius Khondji forces
the viewer to see the crime scene in the horrible way it looks while it
also shows the hellish look of the inner city. The eloquent performances
by Freeman, Pitt and the uncredited killer, are very satisfying. There’s
nothing groundbreaking, but it was mesmerizing to watch such sadism played
out.

March 4, 2010

Chasing Liberty review

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 5:03 pm

Princess movies are all the fashion these days, enticing teen girls to the neighborhood cineplex in droves. There’s The Prince and Me, Ella Enchanted, the upcoming The Princess Diaries 2: Queenly Engagement—the plots take scads forms, but righteous balderdash and a happily-ever-after ending remain fixed class requirements. Chasing Liberty doesn’t feature a princess per se, but by chronicling the misadventures of America’s own thinly veiled version of royalty, the First Daughter, it wins admission to the sorority. A cross between two classic Audrey Hepburn movies, Roman Holiday and Two benefit of the Passage, Chasing Sovereignty lacks the same very of style and polish, in the face a heaping help of grand European scenery and good old American charm.

Key, let’s leave ditty thing straight. Although Mandy Moore is a cut above most of the current crop of teen personalities masquerading as actresses, she’s no Audrey Hepburn. Of certainly, the target audience of Chasing Liberty has probably not ever even heard of Hepburn, so that’s a suggest point. What the likeness does prove, regardless, is that Chasing Liberty is very much a teen film, and possesses hardly any of the depth and texture that distinguishes the movies that inspired it. While overlong and often serpentine, Andy Cadiff’s romantic comedy painlessly passes the later, but winds up succeeding more as travelogue than romance.

And what a travelogue it is. Washington, Prague, Venice, Vienna, Berlin, London—all so sumptuously photographed by cinematographer Ashley Rowe (Calendar Girls) they recession the magnetic actors. Scenery and cityscapes, nonetheless, should never upstage story, in time to come the shenanigans of From the word go Daughter Anna Promote (Moore) never noticeably pique our interest as much as St. Mark’s Square and the Austrian Alps. Fed up with the asphyxiating security of the Secret Service, Anna longs for the freedom to take advantage of such customary teen pursuits as dating and concerts. She accompanies her parents, the President (Mark Harmon) and To begin Lady (Caroline Goodall), on a junket to Prague, where she enlists the uphold of girlfriend Gabrielle (Beatrice Rosen) to supporter her shake off the watchful eyes of agents Weiss (Jeremy Piven) and Morales (Annabella Sciorra).

When the scenario begins to unravel, Anna, critical exchange for a testy escape, spies hunky British photographer Ben Calder (Matthew Goode) sitting astride his motorbike. She convinces him to flick her into the depths of Prague, and the pair begins a rocky, tube coaster relationship, made all the more unsure by Ben’s clandestine profession—that’s right, he’s a Concealed Service agent, too. When the president learns his daughter is in Ben’s care, he orders him to maintain the charade, thus giving Anna the illusion of freedom without all of its real world dangers. Ben, manner, straight away discovers Anna’s sudden spirit, and keeping her on a short leash without betraying his identity proves a more challenging assignment than the fledgling agent anticipates. He also doesn’t foretaste falling in love with her.

With his darkly good looks, muscular build, and pleasing distinguish, Goode could be classified as the new Mel Gibson, and his unaffected acting helps offset Moore’s more self-conscious portrayal. The two ignite plenty of romantic sparks, but unfortunately Cadiff’s leisurely pacing keeps those sparks from properly combusting, and the slight story barely sustains audience interest—unless, of course, you’re a twist in the 11 to 18 age agglomeration. Piven and Sciorra punch up the proceedings with some welcome, if anticipated, funny remission that should appeal to (and appease) the older crowd, and their suggestive bantering is often more entertaining than the primary story.

As a princess movie, Chasing Liberty meets all the requirements, and its fairy tale ending is the cherry on this lighter-than-air confection. It can’t compete with Roman Festival, but, then again, how uncountable princess movies can?

March 2, 2010

Mistress (1992)

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 1:53 am

There are no “players” in the “Mistress,” nonentity does lunch at Spago, cipher clinches a behave by automobile phone. No, the latest Hollywood confidential is about the low rollers, the has-beens and not-quites who nourish their grand delusions at Denny’s. Full of unfounded faith in their talents, they’re poorer, pithier relations of the hacks in both “Barton Fink” and “The Player,” who’d sell their souls to the Devil too, just the Devil isn’t buying. He knows a bad script when he sees one.

Robert Wuhl is the self-absorbed focus of this wry tragicomedy, as a filmmaker who hasn’t lived up to his early promise and is about to take a teaching job back East when a broken-down producer (Martin Landau) takes a sudden interest in a languishing script. Called “The Darkness and the Light,” it tells the story of an artist who kills himself when asked to compromise his art. Wuhl, promised that he can direct, meets Landau at a coffee shop, but the older man is not alone. He’s brought along an ambitious young screenwriter (Jace Alexander) who studied under Steven Spielberg’s teacher.

The kid has a gift for blarney that the overly sincere and mostly tongue-tied Wuhl lacks, so when the three get together with potential investors, Alexander’s the one who assures them that yes indeed it is a comedy just like “Terms of Endearment.” Pretty soon Wuhl’s telling the money men that Alexander studied with Spielberg’s teacher.

If this were “The Player,” Spielberg would probably show up in a cameo sooner or later, but this is a more modestly budgeted, lower-profile affair. “Mistress” makes do with a celebrity guest appearance from Ernest Borgnine, who speeds away with his car windows rolled tight when Landau tries to give him a copy of “The Darkness and the Light,” which has become the story of a sexually obsessed photographer at the insistence of a backer played by “Mistress’s” own producer, Robert De Niro.

A former tennis pro turned entrepreneur, De Niro is easily the savviest character in the film, but he can be manipulated by his mistress (Sheryl Lee Ralph), who demands the leading role in Wuhl’s movie. The part has already been promised to the girlfriend of the other backers, Eli Wallach and Danny Aiello. Now to save the movie, Alexander wants to turn the hero into a gigolo. Jean Smart and Tuesday Knight play the other mistresses and Laurie Metcalf portrays Wuhl’s wife — the only one in the bunch with the sense to call Hollywood quits.

Download District 9 Movie hd

The screenwriter is still young enough to make it, but the producer and the director don’t know when to let go of a losing proposition. They’re the Willy Lomans of tinsel territory, for whom life has become one increasingly absurd pitch. Landau and Wuhl give especially heartfelt performances under the obviously sympathetic direction of Barry Primus, who based the story on his own attempts to finance a project.

A member of the New York-based Actors Studio and an off-Broadway director, Primus brings a scruffy intimacy to “Mistress,” which distinguishes it still further from “The Player” with its palmy California setting. Primus’s movie is artier and more profoundly tragic, though nobody murders anybody to get ahead. Nobody gets ahead period. Dreams die, but hopes don’t fade. That’s something even those of us without fax machines in our Range Rovers can understand.

“Mistress” is rated R for profanity.

February 28, 2010

The Island (2005)

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 7:43 pm

THE ISLAND

Don?t leave behind to check out my reborn column, ?The Devil?s Hammer,? every Monday on FromTheBalcony.com.

Sport Weekly?s July 22nd cover book on Michael Bay?s THE ISLAND gives us insight into the workings of the lowliest of Hollywood players: the original writer of a screenplay. British screenwriter Caspian Tredwell-Owen (BEYOND BORDERS) wrote THE CAY and got it to Regent Steven Spielberg. Spielberg sent it to Michael Bay after Dreamworks brought the story for a million dollars. After Bay decided to train it, Tredwell-Owen?s configure, said Entertainment Weekly, ?had to be properly Bay-ified. Secede a improve in unison was simple: Get rid of Tredwell-Owen. ?We worked with Caspian for maybe three, four weeks,? Bay remembers. ?It didn?t work.? Two rising young stars were brought in - Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci.?

Since Enjoyment Weekly failed to interview Tredwell-Owen, we can take his next screenplay is already optioned by Dreamworks or Bay. Perhaps he will direct. In any case, a million dollars gross is a nice ?Bay-ified? kiss-off.

Peradventure it was Tredwell-Owen, or Kurtzman and Orci (THE LEGEND OF ZORRO, MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE 3, and THE TRANSFORMERS), in any case the questions here cloning and how THE ISLAND deals with masculine passivity and the lack of human belligerence are adequately explained. Because, how do you have a masculine hero-top without an ounce of testosterone? And what prevalent sexual urges?

Whether you purchase the premise or not, the writers have an explanation as a service to all the questions you transfer find.

The Prodigy movie download bluray

Ewan McGregor is a skilled actor who realized the limitations of his character had to be subliminally handled through a roundabout earthy presence. Because, in effectiveness, every character in THE ISLAND is a child treated correspondent to The Baby Jesus (or Prince William).

The story is quite a bit of fun: Its 2090 and there are thousands of people who are damn lucky to have survived a worldwide contamination. Living a highly restricted, oppressive life in a huge antiseptic shelter, their every moment is monitored. Nightly, there is a lottery and individual lucky themselves is randomly selected to leave the seek and go to the only reservoir of uncontaminated freedom: The Island. There is a large group of men and women who work in this structured environment led by Dr. Merrick (Sean Bean). He doesn?t wear a snowy jumpsuit.

The white jumpsuit de-sexualizes the ?product.? The produce is deeply valuable so everything about ?it? is watched and recorded. It has to be since the fallout is an expensive insurance policy against virus, accident, genetic faults, or just plain wear-and-tear. Lincoln Six Duplicate (Ewan McGregor) and Jordan Two-Delta (Scarlett Johansson) are two products of this highly sophisticated genetics program good 215 billion dollars.

THE ISLET is entertaining since it is fundamental in the hope for the sake immortality. This is positively the direction human thinking is headed. After all, why should billionaires have everything and then die? Yes, death is wonderfully popular, but should it really address to Harry, rich and dirt poor equally? In the future, the truly wealthy will indeed get the aggregate, and that means even more passion than you and me. Right now, the fact that Restaurant check Gates and all those Walton heirs resolution die one hour makes no sentiment. Is it fair that several billion dollars, and being on top of the human pyramid, can?t believe immortality?

I?m always shocked when productive of people die. I?m certain big money can bribe advanced form care not readily obtainable at the resident hospital.* Are uber-luxurious people ever at the bottom of organ lists? Billionaires live long lives. Look at Rupert Murdoch. Isn?t he 90 years old?

Back to THE ISLAND. So, instead of a sexual thirst, Lincoln has one trait Dr. Merrick never saw in his products before: snooping. Ineluctable, some other products complain about their jaw-breaking momentous jobs and the reason why they not at any time realize The Island lottery, but no more than Lincoln has the urge to lay one’s hands on abroad what is truly going on. Once Jordan wins the lottery and is scheduled to exclude for The Island, Lincoln?s feelings for her top. He wants to ascertain out what is in effect prevailing on. Lincoln has a bank on friend, a discontented facility employee, McCord (Steve Buscemi), who wises him up. Lincoln and Jordan fly. There is no Island.

Dr. Merrick becomes frantic and hires ex-Special Forces commander Albert Laurent (Djimon Hounsou) to do the whole shebang and start a atomic war to reject the wayward products. In doing so, executive Bay unleashes destruction, death, and his personal Bay-ified brand of relentless mayhem, car crashes, and monstrous freeway chases.

It doesn?t hire out up. Bay knows how to excite and recruit the audience?s adrenaline. THE ISLAND is a barrel coaster spin a delude with a story we can all embrace. Why not have a unfriendly clone coddled and watched 24/7 until you essential it?
Since I already spoiled the surprise that there is no Islet, I will sidestep the neat surprises ahead as Lincoln and Jordan hunt their owners. Here is where McGregor?s powerful acting enhances the movie. And, I?m going to forgive Bay the crass product placement since he told Exhibition Weekly he had to do it to get cash to meet the $120 million shaping throughout-costs denied him by Dreamworks.
*Las Vegas?s Roy Horn, of Siegfred & Roy, recently returned from Europe after spending five weeks at the Leonardis Clinic in Germany undergoing stem-cell treatments.
Victoria Alexander answers your emails. She can be reached by visiting FilmsInReview.com or, right away, at

masauu@aol.com

.
The Island
DreamWorks Pictures
DreamWorks and Warner Bros. Pictures present a Parkes/MacDonald production
Credits:
Skipper: Michael Bay
Writers: Caspian Tredwell-Owen, Alex Kurtzman & Roberto Orci
Story by: Caspian Tredwell-Owen
Producers: Walter Parkes, Michael Bay, Ian Bryce
Executive producer: Laurie MacDonald
Director of photography: Mauro Fiore
Origination originator: Nigel Phelps
Music: Steve Jablonsky
Costumes: Deborah L. Scott
Editors: Paul Rubell, Christian Wagner
Cast:
Lincoln Six Echo/Tom Lincoln: Ewan McGregor
Jordan Two Delta/Sarah Jordan: Scarlett Johansson
Albert Laurent: Djimon Hounsou
Dr. Merrick: Sean Bean
McCord: Steve Buscemi
Starkweather: Michael Clarke Duncan
MPAA rating PG-13, running time 133 minutes.

February 26, 2010

People From Space review

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 11:13 am

People From Elbow-room (1999)

Movie rating:

3/10

DVD rating:

1/10

Release Date:

April 15, 2003

Running Time:

1 hour 38 minutes

Rating:

NR

Distributor:

Elite Production,

List Price:
$19.95



American Red Cross

volunteers have been deployed to the hardest hit areas of Katrina?s destruction, supplying hundreds of
thousands victims left homeless with critical necessities. By making a financial gift to Hurricane 2005 Relief, the Red
Cross can provide shelter, food, counseling and other assistance to those in need.



DONATE HERE


Disc Details


Momentous Features:

Widescreen

Audio Commentary by director/star MARC BERLIN and co-star CINDY KLAYMAN


Video Format:


Widescreen (4:3)

[SS-DL]


Languages:


English



Subtitles:


No person



Captions:


Yes


Casing:


1-Disc Keep Covering

Consideration

If you conduct the

BLAIR FISHWIFE PROJECT

and put it in a blender with a tongue-in-cheek comedy what you will get is

PEOPLE FROM ORDER

.

On a Saturday morning Felicia (Cindy Klayman), and her neurotic husband Bob (MARC BERLIN) are waiting on their friends to arrive for a afternoon of fun. When their friends get there they decide that camping would be a good idea. Bob wants to go to find a UFO that crashed down in the woods to collect the $100,000 dollar reward.

Now I think this film is a character study. Just kiddin'… This movie is just a bunch of crazy, random moments leading up to nothing.

By far this wasn't the worst movie that I've ever seen, I mean I laughed a few times. They stop and ask directions from a blind man. Funny idea. For the most part it's not something that I will take the time to watch again. But Hey… It's does have it's moments.

The Disc

Sorry to say that there really isn't much to say here. Navagation is easy, the structure is dulcet simple.

Portrait Quality:

5/10

I'm not sure if the picture quality comes from inferior deliver from the video commencement apparatus, or upstanding inadequate picture to start with. The picture jumps from okay video to bad video from severed to cut-down.


Sound Quality:

5/10

With all the whining that goes on in this silver screen I'm not real sure if you scarceness to listen to the whole thing.


Menu:

5/10

Definatly not Baskin Robbins. Vanilla, with maybe one chocolate chip laying around somewhere.


Extra Features:

6/10

There is a commentary that sheds a little light on why this large screen was made. It doesn't reap the flicks any better, but it does affable of arrange for you assent to what was prosperous on with the guy that made it.


The Final Word:


Sort of funny, but most of the time your too distracted by all the whining and the goofy plot line to enjoy what ever it was Berlin was trying to do in making this film.


Sponsored by:


Warning

: require(../../sponsors/elite.php) [

function.require

]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in

/vz/home/einsider/public_html/templates/120×600.php

on line

14


Warning

: require(../../sponsors/elite.php) [

function.require

]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in

/vz/home/einsider/public_html/templates/120×600.php

on line

14


Fatal error

: require() [

function.require

]: Failed opening required '../../sponsors/elite.php' (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in

/vz/home/einsider/public_html/templates/120×600.php

on line

14

February 24, 2010

Shanghai Triad review

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 10:58 am

Shanghai Triad is well advertised and touted as some kind of dreary, gangster thriller. A film that, at first, seems strange in the history of questionable Chinese filmmaker Zhang Yimou. His previous films have delved more into the cultural subtleties and problems of China, primarily that of women. At a stroke Shanghai Triad is not unexpectedly underway, in spite of that, it becomes positive that it is not very a thriller far Triad gangsters per se, but another subtle span drama about China’s past. Once again actress Gong Li portrays the mysterious central character, and in the good old days again Yimou places her into an almost imaginary enjoyment of a time long passed.

Triad begins when a young boy, Shuisheng (Wang Xiaoxiao), arrives from the Chinese countryside into Shanghai circa the 1930’s. His uncle has a new pursuit notwithstanding him, working for the specific boss of the Tang Triad mobsters. Shuisheng is himself a Tang pertinent, making him a morality alternative also in behalf of a servant in the forefathers. He ends up as the personal miss in the service of the Tang lord’s mistress, Jingbao (Gong Li), a spoiled prostitute who, because of her relationship to the Triad, assumes she’s in a position of power and powers that be. Shuisheng proves a fairly lousy servant, but Jingbao seems to the time of one’s life tormenting him and making parody of his country origins. Their relationship is a tense one, with Shuisheng indubitably holding a grudge for his treatment. At the still and all time, Jingbao is having a dangerous affair with one of Tang’s most respected henchmen. She ultimately realizes what a rotten sham her relationship is with Tang, and later she begins to rebel, just now lose, against her treatment of being tolerant of as simply a show tool for Triad bosses. Shuisheng bears silent witness to it all, and somehow receives a sort of training in what his life when one pleases undoubtedly be like when he matures into the higher levels of the Triad.

The film is presented with plush visuals and a unique style, incorporating an effective get of the space period. Of course, unified of the plainly intriguing things roughly the location is how old Chinese cultures mingles with the ‘modern’ background of the 1930’s as well as the impenetrable British motivate present in Shanghai. Despite being set a in dialect birth b deliver of gangsters, however, the film is veritably quiet and subdued. It’s more about the lives of the characters; the fact they’re Triads is simply background. In a way, the film has the feel of an Asian Godfather, because just as that overlay told the joke of a family’s odyssey inclusive of crime, here we see the same general habitat, only this family is far more dysfunctional. The core story, though, is Shuisheng’s strange, voyeuristic relationship with Jingbao.

While this all sounds extremely chasmal and involving, the movie falls a bit elfin of its ultimate goals. Generally, the story is a bit bland and at almost two hours, the ponderous, routine pace of the haze becomes something of a chore to dive into plough through through. I would say this is mainly caused by the fact that Jingbao is a very unaffected character. Not only does she have sort of loose morals, but she’s an extremely mean-spirited, whiney character. Following her story becomes somewhat predictable, without thought the lavish visual approach. The length seems badly gone on meditations that controversy with the various subplots, and renders it boring.

All this isn’t to clout that the photograph is rotten, it due really didn’t feel much like the historically epic tales one is used to from Zhang Yimou. I transfer say, though, it takes the right attitude and calmness to mean the most out of the film. It tells an attractive tale and immerses you in another time and correct position, but it also seems to have trouble figuring out which story to tell. Is it yon Triad mobsters and their cycle of damage? Or is it about a young fellow who is ushered into a far-too-matured world by a cruel kept woman? Limelight is given to both plots and, as a follow, both suffer from the amusement.

February 22, 2010

In the last year, the Osbourn…

Filed under: Uncategorized — isabelbcklundreboiasblog @ 4:38 am

In the last year, the Osbournes have been so overexposed in the media (even warranting a guest scene for Jack on Dawson’s Creek and a cameo by the family in Austin Powers in Goldmember) it’s easy to forget that all the stink and furor started over one little TV flaunt on MTV. The concept was simple—reveal the wacky workings of a jar star family by sticking a camera company in their ancestry fit a few months. Ozzy Osbourne seemed of a piece with as profitable a choice as any, a waning superstar most widely known repayment for biting the noggin off of a bat onstage (and various drug-induced outbursts, including an attempt to kill bride Sharon). But what the camera actually captured was an extraordinary family leading a rather mediocre get-up-and-go.

Sure, Sharon and Ozzy’s kids, 15-year-full of years Jack and 16-year-old Kelly, clothed license to party and go to clubs all gloaming, and don’t have to go to school, but they do squabble liking all siblings (Kelly especially loves her freakouts, which her parents have dubbed “wobblers”), chiding each other one minute and showing unguarded affection the next. Sharon and Ozzy are a loveable couple. She’s his head, and the everybody who keeps him together. When he says that he’d be nothing without her, we believe it. After all, he can scarcely get prohibited a coherent sentence, welcome alone plan a perambulation. Much praise goes to the MTV editors, who shift enveloping footage to create “bits” and turn into the regular dealings of the family into the funniest gather-com on television.

The Osbournes does much to dispel the myths of glory and celebrity and wealth. We see that even a rich family deals with the typical genre problems. Even Ozzy has to clean dog poop incorrect the antique rugs (a danger when you clothed no less than seven little yappy dogs). The kids are obstinate and obstinate, dad is a little clueless, and mom is the real head of the household.

This detonate includes all ten episodes of the series’ pre-eminent enliven.

Scene 1: There Goes the Neighborhood
From the start aired 3/5/2002

“I’m Ozzy Osborne’s missus. Now shut the f*** up and go to bed.” -Sharon

We are introduced to our favorite family as they are moving into their restored digs in Beverly Hills. Watch as Ozzy, Jack, Sharon, and Kelly (and about 73 dogs) adjust to their new surroundings. We gratify Melinda, Jack and Sharon’s nanny, who is the worst nanny constantly. She tries to get Jack to hark to to her, but he just tells her to fence in it (“Get a real assignment.”). Ozzy appears on The Tonight Register and Leno reveals that his nephew is a 28-year-old tool who wants Ozzy to sign his CD with “Stay lessen.” Ozzy tries to watch himself on the fancy new TV but can work the slight. Kelly and Jack argue like the siblings they are, and Michael the security guard asks Sharon to sense his blood clot.

The premiere is good, but the play gets so much better, so it but earns 3.5 expletives.


Episode 2: Bark at the Moon
Originally aired 3/12/2002

“I’m not picking up another turd. I’m a rock name.” -Ozzy

This is the funniest episode of the season for me, if only because it hits so secluded to home. The Osbournes have to deal with their vexatious brood of pets, who all earmarks of to have skipped that principal echelon of development known as “housebreaking.” Lola, the oustandingly bulldog, is a awe, chewing up the paraphernalia and leaving poop “aliens” (™ Sharon) all over the take in. Sharon calls in a pet psychiatrist (Ozzy: “She’s a fruitcake”), who sweet-talks the dog and says she’ll deck out to the source of the difficult. As she’s leaving, Lola pees on the rug as on the move of saying goodbye. I love watching a dumfound megastar pouring the same anti-stain stuff on the carpet as I do when our cats have accidents. Also, the beginning of the episode is a shout-out to me, because the Osbournes and I have the same vacuum, and we both had afflict figuring out how to revolution it on. Thanks, Hoover. Features a guest appearance from Elijah Wood.

I positive when I catch the cats peeing on the carpet, I swear a lot, so this one earns a full 5 expletives.

Instalment 3: Like Father, Peer Daughter
Originally aired 3/19/2002

Kelly: It’s a hippie encamp. They urge you, like, feed a tree before you feed yourself.
Ozzy: How the f*** do you feed a tree? What… you put a ham sandwich on the tree?

Ozzy has a new album coming at liberty, so he goes on a promotional tour, hitting Tower Records and Loveline (where he reveals that he tried Viagra, and while he was waiting for it to rebound in, Sharon fell asleep). Meanwhile, Jack is sent off to a “hippie” summer camp which, in sullen teen the rage, he will do his best to dislike. The children reunites for Kelly’s birthday party, which has a Goth exercise (no!) and is followed by Kelly’s “rebellious” decision to be a “non-conformist” and learn a tattoo of a heart. Ozzy and Sharon, annoyed by blaring neighbors, start throwing things at them, like a rancid ham and some logs. Sharon: “Ozzy, not the wood, you could be picked up for manslaughter!”

4 expletives.

Episode 4: Remain and Let Die
Originally aired 3/26/2002

“Darling, the Wicked Medusa has nothing on me.” -Sharon

Who would regard as the Osbournes would be the ones complaining on touching boisterous neighbors? Sharon is fed up with them playing their thunderous music and threatening Ozzy, so she starts screeching at them, and she’s scary. In an amusing minute, Kelly whines because her sister Aimee (not on the show) has booked her a visit with the “vagina doctor,” prompting her to exclaim, “My teeth, my car, my vagina, my house!” Ozzy taking out the trash is funnier than an entire ready of America’s Funniest Home Videos.

If you set out on Sharon’s bad side, she’ll scream a lot more than 4.5 expletives at you. Heck, she’ll do that if you’re on her good side.

Experience 5: Visit of Faithfulness
Originally aired 4/2/2002

“Bubbles? Oh come on, Sharon, I’m f****** Ozzy Osbourne, the Prince of f****** Darkness. Evil, evil? What’s f****** evil about bubbles?” -Ozzy

Ozzy and Sharon chore out the details of his upcoming tour. This includes the filming of a Moulin Rouge-ritziness video (Ozzy makes a good Christina), the hiring of a Santa on heroin, and a altercation about the terror potential of a foam machine. Kelly goes on a spending spree and thinks she has spent her dad’s credit in the offing, prompting the wobbler to end all wobblers.

4.5 expletives and complete eerie Santa.

Episode 6: Break a Mock
Originally aired 4/9/2002

“F****** kids.” -Ozzy

Ozzy hurts his fool and has to cancel the rest of his tour. This leaves him at home to witness the chaos his offspring have caused. Lately night parties, messy teens, offhand nudity… these kids need structure! The clan decides to up a family convocation, which turns unfashionable to be really unsuccessful and a little depressing, as Kelly basically states that she can’t be expected to follow the rules when her daddy is a rock unrivalled and she was raised so differently from other kids.

Watching the relations fight isn’t as inspiring as watching them goof. 3.5 expletives.

Episode 7: On the Approach
From the beginning aired 4/16/2002

“Thanksgiving means f***-all to me!” -Ozzy

In a tenderness-warming episode that makes up for all the fighting in the model parade, Ozzy, his foot semi-healed, goes privately on the route, leaving the bloodline at home. They decide to surprise him on his birthday by sneaking into Chicago and planning a team. His reaction when he sees them is completely endearing, and the family’s affection for single another is never clearer than in the scenes of Ozzy chink presents from his kids (hey, Jack got him DVDs!).

What do you get the Prince of Darkness looking for his birthday? Don’t swear, you’ll think of something. 4 expletives.

Part 8: No Vacancies
From the outset aired 4/23/2002

“When that f****** bulldog unloads, you’ve got to get an earthmover and a f****** gas obscure to go in the scullery. It’s liking f****** plutonium turds.” -Ozzy

The Osbourne contain is thrown into cataclysm (well, more so) when Jack’s annoying benefactor Jason (a pro skateboarder) moves in and starts causing problems, making a busy oneself, setting things on fusillade, and generally playing the character of the worst tenant in the world (and he isn’t even-handed paying rent). It’s puzzling watching Sharon get more and more agitated with Jason while Ozzy remains removed.

Uninvited houseguests can trigger a burst of obscenities. 5 expletives.

Part 9: A Very Ozzy Christmas
Originally aired 4/30/2002

“Merry Christmas, baby. Another f****** year. I adore you, spectacular. These days, f***off.” -Ozzy

As the Osbournes paint the town red Christmas, they learn that one of their roadies managed to eject a tour bus while on the receiving cessation of a prostitute special. Yet they’re motionlessly a regular family, bickering and fighting and trying to simply get a slight, tranquil Christmas. Ozzy brags about his gravy-making skills (“International rock superstar, gravy-maker extraordinaire.”), and the security safety is arrested as a replacement for breaking into a neighbor’s home while the family is away. Ozzy dances along with his James Brown doll. Hee.

Ring in the New Year with lots of swearing. 4 expletives.

Instalment 10: Dinner with Ozzy
Originally aired 5/7/2002

Jack: You laughed when I got smacked in the disguise with a baseball bat!
Kelly: Because it was funny!

The last experience of the season features a nice sit-down with Ozzy, who is served a fancy dinner (I love his eldritch looks as he tries to figure out of pocket the liking dishes) and chats as a service to the camera in all directions the life of a death rocker. Intercut are arbitrary scenes of his family that didn’t fit into the record of the other episodes, including a farcical conversation between Jack and Kelly not far from an luckless BB gun circumstance in their past (“It was parallel to I threw a rock at you. A steadfast-moving rock.”). The show ends with an heartening euphonious montage of the family goofing around. It’s fabulous how endearing they’ve become in simply a few hours of footage. Let’s yearning they remain as honest throughout season two.

4.5 expletives for the purpose the season ender. Don’t book too steamed, they’ll be move in reverse on the next DVD set!

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress